The Supreme Court of the United States has held that when a participant in a plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) wholly dissipates a third-party settlement on non traceable items, the plan fiduciary may not bring suit to attach the participant’s separate assets. This case is likely to prompt plans to act more quickly in the future when third-party reimbursements are involved.
Full content is available to DMEC members only. Please log in to view the complete resource.
If you are not a DMEC member, we encourage you to join. DMEC members have access to white papers, case studies, @Work magazine articles, free webinars, legislative updates, and much more. These resources will assist you in building an effective and compliant integrated absence management program, saving you time, resources, and money. Learn more.
If you are being asked to log in more than once, please refresh your browser.Supreme Court Limits Subrogation Recoveries,