RTW Case Study: Impact of Employer Size

DMEC Staff@Work

Impact of Employer Size on STD Claims for Mental and Musculoskeletal Conditions

STD Musculoskeletal ClaimsBy Michael Klachefsky

Consultant
ClaimVantage

To more deeply explore the analysis around employer size provided in the feature article in this issue of @Work, we investigated mental health (MH) and musculoskeletal (MSK) condition claims to further understand the impact of employer size. Using a data set with both insured and self-insured STD plans that are outsourced to a carrier or administrator,1 we examined these conditions in STD because, among all employers, MSK and MH conditions both rank in the top four for payments per closed claim and percent of closed claims (a proxy for incidence). In addition, MSK medical insurance claims have had the second-highest spending growth between 2000-2013.2

Figure 1 below shows the differences between the larger employer and the smaller employer groups. We chose the 20,000 threshold because the number of claims was similar above and below the threshold although the number of employers in each category differed greatly.

Full content is available to DMEC members only. Please log in to view the complete resource.

If you are not a DMEC member, we encourage you to join. DMEC members have access to white papers, case studies, @Work magazine articles, free webinars, legislative updates, and much more. These resources will assist you in building an effective and compliant integrated absence management program, saving you time, resources, and money. Learn more.

If you are being asked to log in more than once, please refresh your browser.